Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Perbuatan Gratifikasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan No : 35/Pid.Sus.Tpk/2016/PN. Mdn)
Abstract
Gratuity is a new thing in the criminal act of corruption. Changes made to the previous regulation aim at overcoming the many modes and series of actions of civil servants and state administrators that have an impact on state financial losses and public welfare. The research method used is a normative method and this research is analytical descriptive. Regulations on acts of gratuity in corruption and criminal liability given by judges based on decision number: 35 / Pid.Sus.TPK / 2016 / PN.Mdn. Laws and regulations governing gratification have been set out in Article 12 B of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption, Factors for Acceptance of Gratuity due to greed, organization, and conflict of interests of civil servants or state administrators, and criminal liability given by the judges based on their considerations have considered mitigating and burdensome matters as well as paying attention to the absence of justification and forgiveness for imposing penalties in the form of imprisonment for 5 years and a fine of Rp. . 200,000,000 towards the perpetrators.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku Saku KPK, Memahami Gratifikasi. Cetakan Pertama, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Jakarta, 2010.
Chaerudin, dkk, 2008, Strategi Pencegahan & PenegakkanHukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Refika Adhitama, Bandung.
Hamzah, R. (2019). Implementasi Peran Serta Masyarakat dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 6 (1) Juni 2019: 1-13.
Harahap, M.I.M. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Korupsi dengan Menggunakan Jabatan (Studi Putusan No. 296/Pid.B/2010/PN.Mdn). Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS). 1 (1): 1-8.
Hasibuan, Winna M. Kusmanto, H. & Warjio. (2019). Kaitan Sitem Pemilu dan Korupsi Legislatif Tapanuli Tengah periode 2015-2020. JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. 11 (2) (2019): 408-417.
Hidayat, dan Ediwarman, (2013), Analisis Hukum Perlindungan Korban dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kabupaten Aceh Timur (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri IDI), Mercatoria, 6 (1): 44-63
Https://Www.Lawmetha.Wordpress.Com/2011/05/19/Metodepenelitianhukumnorrmatif.Html?M=1.
Junjungan, M., Marlina, (2013), Penerapan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kabupaten Labuhan Batu (Studi Kasus di Kepolisian Resor Labuhan Batu), Mercatoria, 6 (2): 117-132
Lubis, F.H., dan Marlina, (2010), Penegakan Hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa (Studi pada Pengadilan Negeri Kuala Simpang), Mercatoria, 3 (2): 88-101
Pasaribu, O.L.H., Iman J., dan Elvi Z.L., (2008), Kajian Yuridis terhadap Putusan Bebas Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan), Mercatoria, 1 (2): 130-140
Sunggono, Bambang, 1997, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Syarif, Laode M. dan Purwoleksono, Didik E. (ed), 2015. Hukum Anti Korupsi, United State Agency Of International Development.
Zebua, F.R.P., Iman J., dan Taufik S., (2008), Tanggungjawab Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Ahli Warisnya Dalam Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Kerugian Keuangan Negara Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan), Mercatoria, 1 (2): 150-162
Jamillah, J. (2015). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM DALAM PENGEMBALIAN ASET HASIL KORUPSI DI INDONESIA. JURNAL MERCATORIA, 8(2), 163-175. doi:https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v8i2.654
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v1i2.204
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

