Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Jual Beli Berdasarkan Surat Pemesanan Barang Purchase Order) Antara PT. Union Confectionery Dengan PT. Industri Pembungkus Internasional

Mitha Syahfitri; Anggreini Atmei Lubis; Aldi Subhan Lubis

doi:10.31289/juncto.v4i2.1368

Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Jual Beli Berdasarkan Surat Pemesanan Barang Purchase Order) Antara PT. Union Confectionery Dengan PT. Industri Pembungkus Internasional

Mitha Syahfitri, Anggreini Atmei Lubis, Aldi Subhan Lubis

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out whether a Purchase Order (PO) can be categorized as a sale and purchase agreement, what is the mechanism for implementing a sale and purchase agreement between PT. Union Confectionery with PT. International Packaging Industry (PT. IPI) and what are the rights and obligations of the parties in the sale and purchase agreement between PT. Union Confectionery with PT. IPI. The type of research in writing this thesis is normative juridical which is descriptive analysis in nature. The approach method in this study is the statutory approach. A Purchase Order (PO) can be categorized as a sale and purchase agreement because a Purchase Order has the same elements as a sale and purchase agreement as based on the principle of consensualism in the Civil Code. The mechanism for implementing the sale and purchase agreement between PT. Union Confectionery with PT. IPI is the provision of boxes and wrappers using the Purchase Order (PO) system. PT. Every time Union Confectionery places an order with PT. IPI by issuing Purchase Orders (PO) which include specifications, designs, details and quantities of goods. The payment method is 45 (forty five) days after receiving the goods. Rights and Obligations of the Parties in the Cooperation Agreement between PT. Union Confectionery with PT. IPI is PT. Union Confectionery has the right to accept cardboard orders from PT. IPI according to the specifications set by PT. Union Confectionery on Purchase Orders (PO), has the right to request returns for cardboard that does not meet specifications and is obliged to pay for the order. Rights and Obligations of PT. IPI is entitled to receive payments in accordance with the agreed timely, is obliged to make cardboard according to the specifications set by PT. Union Confectionery and is obliged to replace any cartons that do not conform.

Keywords

Juridical Review; Sale and purchase agreement; Purchase Orders.

Full Text:

PDF

References

____________, (1974), Hukum Perdata Tentang Persetujuan-Persetujuan Tertentu, Sumur, Bandung.

Aditya, Surya ST, (2021), hasil wawancara dengan Document Control pada PT. Union Confectionery, tanggal 11 Juni 2021, pukul 11.00 WIB.

Badruljaman, Mariam Darul, (2001), Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Daulay, M.R.A, Barus, U.M & Rafiqi. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Terhadap Produk Obat-Obatan Ilegal (Studi Kasus : BPOM Medan). JUNCTO, 1(2) 2019: 121-128,

Harahap, R.R.M, Munawir, Z & Hidayani, S. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Atas Pemakai Kartu Kredit Tipe Gold Dengan Bank Penerbit Kartu Kredit (Studi Putusan No. 161/Pdt-G/2017/PN. Mdn). JUNCTO, 1(2) 2019: 136-142,

Hidayat, M. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Otoritas Bandar Udara Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Penumpang Jasa Penerbangan. DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW, 3(1), 53-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.31289/doktrina.v3i1.3497

http://docplayer.info/63305151-Bab-ii-gambaran-umum-perusahaan.html, diakses tanggal 13 Juni 2021, pukul 13.20 WIB.

https://accuratesemarang.id/tahapan-dalam-siklus-purchase-order-yang-wajib-kalian-ketahui/, diakses tanggal 17 Juni 2021, pukul 22.01 WIB.

https://www.jurnal.id/id/blog/contoh-purchase-order-po-dan-perbedaannya-dengan-purchase-requisition-pr/, diakses tanggal 29 Agustus 2020, pukul 23.10 WIB.

Irianto, Heru dan Burhan Bungin, (2001), Pokok-Pokok Penting Tentang Wawancara dalam Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif,Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Irwan Andrianto, Kedudukan Purchase Order Dalam Hukum Perjanjian, https://adrlawfirm.wordpress.com/2018/09/19/kedudukan-purchase-order-po-dalam-hukum-perjanjian/, diakses tanggal 16 Juni 2021, pukul 22.10 WIB.

Manual Mutu ISO 900:2015 PT. Union Confectionery.

Marianti, D., Jopi, J., & HUTAGALUNG, G. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman dalam Tindak Pidana Penjualan Obat-Obatan Tanpa Izin. DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW, 3(1), 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.31289/doktrina.v3i1.3247

Miru, Ahmadi, (2017), Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak, Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok.

Napitupulu, O, Rafiqi & Wahyuni, W.S (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perjanjian Pekerjaan Optimalisasi Sistem Pengembangan Air Minum Ibu Kota Kecamatan Siantar Narumonda Kabupaten Toba Samosir (Studi Pada PT. Nugraha Tyaga Supala). JUNCTO, 1(2) 2019: 129-135,

Prodjodikoro, Wirdjono, (2009), Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

PT. Industri Pembungkus Internasional, https://www.ipi.co.id/about, diakses tanggal 15 Juni 2021, pukul 00.16 WIB.

Rahmayanti, R., Naibaho, Y., & Rahtan, A. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Driver Grabcar sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Memanipulasi Data Elektronik (Tinjauan Putusan Nomor 853/PID.SUS/2018/PNMKS). JURNAL MERCATORIA, 13(2), 118-130. doi:https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v13i2.4154

Raja G. Dejan, G, Barus, U.M & Muazzul. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Sebagai Faktor Penyebab Tidak Dapat Diterimannnya Gugatan (Studi Kasus Putusan No 150/Pdt.G/2016/PN Lbp). JUNCTO, 1(1) 2019: 41-51

Rehulina, R. (2018). Keabsahan Digital Signature dalam Perjanjian E-Commerce. DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW, 1(1), 45-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.31289/doktrina.v1i1.1609

Ridho, S.A.P.M & Alvi, H (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Pernikahaan Terhadap Anggota TNI Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2014 (Studi Kasus Putusan No: 44-K/PM.I-02/AD/IV/2018 Pengadilan Militer I-02 Medan) JUNCTO, 1(1) 2019: 1-9,

Sari, T.I., Hasibuan, A.L., & Rafiqi. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perjanjian

Pemborongan Bangunan Gedung Badan Pengelolaan Pajak Dan Retribusi Provinsi Sumatera Utara.

JUNCTO, 2(1) 2020: 1-8

Siagian, F.F. & Jamilah. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Alasan Penerbitan Peraturan

Pemerintah Pengganti Undang Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah.

JUNCTO, 2(1) 2020: 78-86

Simatupang. Richard Buton, (2007), Aspek HukumDalam Bisnis, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta: 2007.

Sinaga, A.P, Lubis, A. A & Munthe, R. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Permufakatan Jahat Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No : 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor : 423/Pid/2018/PN. Mdn). JUNCTO, 1(1) 2019: 10-18,

Sinaga, Niru Anita, (2019), Implementasi Hak dan Kewajiban Para Pihak Dalam Hukum Perjanjian, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara–Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma | Volume 10 No. 1, September 2019.

Sipahutar, A. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Anak Dari Hasil Perkawinan Siri Yang Ditelantarkan Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak. DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW, 2(1), 66-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.31289/doktrina.v2i1.2383

Subekti, (2005), Hukum Perjanjian, Intermasa, Jakarta.

Waluyo, Bambang, (2006), Metode Penelitian Hukum, Semarang: Grafika Indonesia.

Wilbert, W., Wau, K., & Chelsia, V. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Mie Kuning Basah dengan Menggunakan Bahan Formalin (Putusan Nomor 2796/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Mdn). JURNAL MERCATORIA, 13(1), 62-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v13i1.3645

Yusra, Dhoni, et.al, Analisa Atas Surat Pemesanan Barang Purchasing Order) Sebagai Perjanjian Jual Beli, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Lex Jurnalica Volume 9 Nomor 1, April 2012.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v4i2.1368