Authority of The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) Medan Regional Office in Completing Prohibited Activities

Nurasiah Harahap

Abstract


The authority of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) Medan Regional Office I in resolving prohibited activities is crucial to regulating and ensuring the fairness of business competition in Indonesia. This research aims to dig deeper into the authority of the KPPU in handling violations that harm business competition in the region. The research method used is a literature study, which collects data from various primary and secondary sources related to KPPU regulations and practices. The research results show that the KPPU Regional Office in Medan has broad authority in detecting, investigating, and taking action against violations that violate business competition law in its region. However, challenges such as limited resources and coordination with related agencies hinder enforcing compliance. Therefore, there is a need for more integrated and synergistic efforts between the KPPU and related parties to ensure the effectiveness of business competition law enforcement and encourage healthy economic development in the region.

Keywords


KPPU; Business Competition; Region I Medan; Prohibited Activities; Law enforcement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (Vol. 7). Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Gunawan, T. (2016). Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Terlarang Dalam Hukum Positif Menurut UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. Lex Crimen, 5(6).

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

Indonesia, U.-U. T. P. S., & No, U.-U. (2008). Tahun 2008. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun, 94.

Kettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century. Jhu Press.

Koeswara, H. (n.d.). Optimalisasi Outcome Anggaran untuk Menciptakan Trust dalam Pengalokasian Belanja Pelayanan Publik pada Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah. PROSIDING, 224.

KURNIAWAN, I. (2015). PENGAJUAN KEBERATAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN KPPU SEBAGAI UPAYA HUKUM DALAM RANGKA PENEGAKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 DI INDONESIA. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Manurung, A. J. (n.d.). PENGARUH GLOBALISASI EKONOMI TERHADAP KETIDAKSETARAAN SOSIAL: STUDI KASUS PADA NEGARA BERKEMBANG.

Musta, A. P., & Erwin, R. (2022). Pengawasan Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) Terhadap Produk Alat Uji Cepat (Rapid Test) Dan Polymerase Chain Reaction (Pcr) Covid-19. Datin Law Jurnal, 3(1).

Nomor, U.-U. (5 C.E.). Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

PERANGIN-ANGIN, A. H. (2022). ANALISIS PERSAINGAN USAHA MODA TRANSPORTASI DARAT DI KOTA MEDAN (ANTARA METRO DELI, ANGKUTAN UMUM, DAN TRANSPORTASI ONLINE).

POSNER, R. (1976). Antitrust Policy: An economic perspective. University of Chicago.

Rachmadi Usman, S. H. (2022). Hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Rengganis, D. R. D. P., & SH, M. H. (2021). Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Perangkat Telekomunikasi dan Pemberlakuan Persetujuan ACFTA. Penerbit Alumni.

Simanjuntak, B. A. (2017). Konsepku Mensukseskan Otonomi Daerah: Membangun Indonesia Berkeadilan Sosial-Ekonomi. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Sutopo, H. B. (2002). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Surakarta: sebelas maret university press.

Sutopo, H. B. (2006). Penelitian kualitatif: Dasar teori dan terapannya dalam penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Tanjung, K., & Siregar, J. (2013). Fungsi dan peran lembaga KPPU dalam praktek persaingan usaha di Kota Medan. Jurnal Mercatoria, 6(1), 64–85.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v6i1.4106

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Email: [email protected]
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License