Systematic Literature Review (SLR): Efektivitas Informasi terhadap Ekspektasi Masyarakat pada Kebijakan Pemerintah dalam Perspektif Psikologi Komunikasi

Syafrizaldi Syafrizaldi, Agung Suharyanto, Yurial Arief Lubis

Abstract


This study aims to systematically examine the development and scientific findings related to the effectiveness of information in shaping public expectations of government policies using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. Public policy information is understood not only as a process of conveying a message, but as a psychological stimulus that influences public perception, attitudes, and expectations. The SLR process is carried out through the stages of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion of literature based on the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted on Google Scholar databases, Scopus (secondary references), and accredited national journals, with a publication range of 2000–2024. The results of the study show that the effectiveness of information is influenced by five main themes, namely the credibility of the source, the message framing strategy, the role of the media agenda, the cognitive bias of the audience, and the level of media literacy. This study confirms that public expectations of government policies are formed through complex psychological processes and mediated by public communication systems. These findings make a theoretical and practical contribution to the development of communication strategies for communication psychology and support transparent and sustainable governance.

Keywords


Systematic Literature Review; Information Effectiveness; Public Expectations; Government Policy; Communication Psychology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ananda, R., Pratama, A., & Siregar, M. (2021). Kepercayaan publik dan peran media daring dalam pembentukan opini kebijakan pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 19(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jik.v19i2.xxxx

Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317

Bouckaert, G., Van de Walle, S., & Kampen, J. K. (2005). Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305053881

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis (6th ed.). Routledge.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12261

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12609

Hidayah, N., & Prakoso, B. (2024). Framing kebijakan pemerintah dalam media nasional. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 22(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jkp.v22i1.xxxx

Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press.

Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.

Kriyantono, R. (2019). Strategi komunikasi publik pemerintah. Prenadamedia Group.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

OECD. (2020). Drivers of trust in public institutions. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/81c9e575-en

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer.

Putra, D. A., & Laksmi, S. (2020). Transparansi informasi publik dan legitimasi kebijakan pemerintah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 17(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jap.v17i1.xxxx

Putri, A. R., & Paramita, S. (2020). Media sosial dan pembentukan opini publik terhadap kebijakan pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 24(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jisip.v24i2.xxxx

Rahmawati, L., Nugroho, A., & Santoso, B. (2021). Framing media atas kebijakan publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jk.v13i1.xxxx

Ramadhan, F., Sari, M., & Hidayat, R. (2024). Efektivitas komunikasi kebijakan pemerintah terhadap kepuasan publik. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jip.v9i1.xxxx

Sari, D., & Hidayat, T. (2022). Informasi kebijakan dan partisipasi publik dalam pemerintahan daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 28(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jan.v28i2.xxxx

Schaefer, U., & Bouwman, R. (2021). Trust, expectations, and public sector performance. Public Management Review, 23(8), 1181–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1764087

Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326.x

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

Van der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2017). Political trust and the “crisis of democracy”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.77

Van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Hameleers, M. (2019). Political trust and protest voting in times of crisis. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12302

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework. Council of Europe.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/tabularasa.v8i1.6363

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Tabularasa: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Program Pascasarjana Magister Psikologi
Universitas Medan Area
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License