Pengaruh Penilaian Kinerja Terhadap Promosi Jabatan Di PT. X Semarang
Abstract
This article aims to determine the effect of performance appraisal on job promotions for employees at PT. X Semarang. The problem focuses on the performance assessment used by PT. X Semarang. To approach this problem, theoretical references from Mathis and Jackson are used. Data was collected through a research scale distributed via Google Form and analyzed using statistical analysis, namely simple linear regression analysis which was used to find out how big the influence of performance appraisal was. The researcher chose simple linear regression analysis as a research methodology to test how big the causal relationship is between the independent variable (X) and the dependent variable (Y). The questionnaire distribution strategy was carried out via Google Form by sharing the Google Form link with several PT employees. X Semarang. This study concludes that performance appraisal has a positive effect on promotion with a total effect of 22.7%. This positive influence means that the higher the performance assessment results, the greater the opportunities for employees at PT. X Semarang received a promotion. Meanwhile, the other 77.3% of job promotions were influenced by other factors, including higher level educational background (starting work only as a high school graduate and during work taking undergraduate education until graduation), work experience held as well as certificates and other skills. which are owned.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Budihardjo, I. M. (2015). Panduan Praktis Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan. Raih Asa Sukses.
Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, A. P. L. (2004). Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(2), 203–221.
Ichsan, R. N., & Nasution, L. (2020). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Promosi Jabatan terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Taspen Kantor Cabang Utama Medan. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 3(2), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v3i2.340
Ii, B. A. B., & Pustaka, T. (n.d.). No Title. 12–32.
Laili, I. (2016). Manajemen sumber daya manusia.
Laverack, G. (2020). Az promosi kesehatan. Airlangga University Press.
Ley 25.632. (2002). 済無No Title No Title No Title. 3(01).
Lindberg, C.-F., Tan, S., Yan, J., & Starfelt, F. (2015). Key performance indicators improve industrial performance. Energy Procedia, 75, 1785–1790.
Manalu, G., Magister, P., Terbuka, U., Kerja, M., & Pegawai, K. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Status Kepegawaian Dan Motivasi. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 2(3), 292–299.
Nur Aziz, & Dewanto, I. J. (2022). Model Penilaiann Kinerja Karyawan dengan Personal Balanced Scorecard. MAMEN: Jurnal Manajemen, 1(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.55123/mamen.v1i2.218
Parmenter, D. (2015). Key performance indicators: developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. John Wiley & Sons.
Subyantoro, A., & Suwarto, F. X. (2020). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategi. Penerbit Andi.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.
Sulandari, N., Rosento, R., & Marthanti, A. S. (2019). Pengaruh Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai terhadap Promosi Jabatan pada Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Perspektif, 17(2), 132–144.
Syaifullah, C. (2016). Performance Appraisal, Reward And Punhisment Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Jurnal Riset Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 4(3).
WIDATI, D. R. (2008). Alternatif penilaian kinerja pegawai negeri sipil pada divisi administrasi kantor wilayah departemen hukum dan HAM Palu. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/tabularasa.v6i2.3599
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Tabularasa: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Psikologi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
