Akibat Hukum Dikabulkannya Permohonan Pernyataan Pailit Oleh Pengadilan Niaga Medan

Julaifa Sarah, Elvi Zahara Lubis, Anggreni Atmei Lubis

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to find out the legal consequences and the judge's consideration of granting the petition for a declaration of bankruptcy in the decision No.03/Pailit/2014/PN.Niaga.Mdn. The type of research in writing this thesis is normative which is solely used to obtain complete data as the basis for writing this scientific paper. Normative research (library study) is finding and collecting data by conducting library research on author sources using normative methods and collecting data by conducting library research on reading sources in the form of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning UUK and PKPU, Law Number 23 of 1847 concerning the Civil Code, Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning the Capital Market, and the decision of the Medan Commercial District Court No.03/Pailit/2014 PN.Niaga-Mdn, which is a case study approach related to the issues discussed. This study concludes that in bankruptcy cases, legal consequences can be found and the panel of judges in their consideration of the parties is seen from the facts and evidence.

Keywords


Legal Consequences; Acceptance; application; Declaration of Bankruptcy; Medan Commercial Court

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2010, hlm. 305.

Adrian Sutedi, Hukum Kepailitan, Ghaila Indonesia, Jakarta,2009, hlm.24.

Ahmad Yani dan Widjaja Gunawan, Seri Hukum Bisnis Kepailitan, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2002, hlm. 85.

Andi.M.Asrun dan Ahsin Thohary, BLBI Perspektif Hukum, Politik dan Ekonomi, Bank Indonesia dan Judisisal Watch Indonesia, Jakarta, 2003, hlm. 5

Asikin Zainal, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran di Indonesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 1991, hlm. 45.

Charlie Rudyat, Kamus Hukum, Tim Pustaka Mahardika, Jakarta, 2013, hlm. 331.

Edward Manik, Cara Mudah Proses Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Penerbit Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2012, hlm 115.

Erman Radjagukguk diterjemahkan Munir Fuady, Pengantar Hukum Bisnis Menata Bisnis Modern di Era Global edisi Revisi, Bandung:PT Citra Aditya Bakti,2005, hlm 23.

Fedriyanti, I., Sutiarnoto, S., & Perdana, S. (2021). Akibat Hukum Putusan Pernyataan Pailit Debitor terhadap Kreditor (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 443K/Pdt.Sus/2012). Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 3(3), 1300-1306. doi:https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v3i3.552

Gunawan Widjaja, Tanggungjawab Direksi atas Kepailitan Perseroan, PT.RajaGrafindo Persada, 2005, Jakarta,, hlm 101.

Imran Nating, Peranan Dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2005. Hal 43-56.

Irsan Nasarudin & Indra surya, Aspek Hukum Pasar Modal Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta, 2004, hlm 2

Keliat, V., Sunarmi, S., Nasution, B., & Azwar, T. (2021). Kewenangan Kurator Dalam Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Dalam Hal Negara Sebagai Kreditor Preferen. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(2), 608-615. doi:https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i2.693

Lilik Mulyadi, Penerapan Putusan Hakim pada Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2007, hlm. 25.

P. Bismar Parlindungan Siregar, Budiman Ginting, Jusmadi Sikumbang & M. Citra Ramadhan. (2019). Aspek Hukum Lembaga Paksa Badan Terkait Penahanan Terhadap Debitur Pailit. ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 1(1) 2019: 89-99.

Poppy Indaryati, Diskriminasi Kurator di dalam Kepailitan, Semarang: Tesis Hukum dan Teknologi Program Pasca Sarjana Undip, 2001, hlm. 38.

Rahayu Hartini, Edisi Revisi Hukum Kepailitan, UMM Press, Malang, 2007, hlm. 3

Richard Burton Simatupang., Aspek Hukum dalam Bisnis, Edisi revisi Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2007, hlm 172-173.

Sari. D.A. & Zahara, E. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Syarat Formil dan Materil dari UU No 37 Tahun 2004 terhadap Perkara Kepailitan pada Putusan Nomor 09/Pdt.Sus-Pkpu/2015/Pn.Niaga Medan, Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 5 (1): 14-21.

Satgas BLBI, Mengurai Benang Kusut BLBI, Bank Indonesia, Jakarta, 2003, hlm. 3-4

Siti anisah, 2008, Kreditor dan debitor dalam Hukum di Indonesia, Total Media, Jakarta, Hal.191

Tirayo, A.M. & Halim, Y. (2019). Problematik Definisi Harta Pailit untuk Mencapai Kepastian Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan Kepailitan dan PKPU, Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 6 (2) 2019: 130 – 137

Tjipto Adinugroho Diterjemahkan oleh Omar Ishananto, Perbankan Masalah Perkreditan, Penghayatan Analisa danPenuntun, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1973, hlm. 98




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v3i2.872

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Email: [email protected]
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License