Pemilu Serentak 2029 Pasca Putusan MK: Antara Kepastian Konstitusi Dan Kekacauan Regulasi

Prista Kelana Saeful Rohman

Abstract


This article aims to analyze the upcoming 2029 simultaneous elections following the Constitutional Court's ruling No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024. The focus is on regulations and the quality of democracy in Indonesia. To approach this issue, theoretical references from constitutional democracy and the theory of the electoral system in Indonesia from 2004 to 2024 are used. Data were collected through a literature review with primary sources being the Constitutional Court's ruling No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024, Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections, and the General Elections Commission (KPU) technical documents and regulations, along with relevant academic literature. All data were analyzed qualitatively using a normative approach to uncover the gap between constitutional norms and their implementing regulations. This study concludes that the Constitutional Court's ruling No. 135/PUU-XXI/2024 was intended to affirm constitutional certainty, but this decision has instead created regulatory chaos because it has not been followed by comprehensive legal reforms. This regulatory vacuum and inconsistency have the potential to undermine election integrity, increase political costs, and threaten the quality of inclusive and accountable democracy in Indonesia ahead of the 2029 elections. As an alternative, a clear transitional design is needed, including scheduling regional elections a maximum of 2.5 years after the national elections, as mandated by the Constitutional Court's ruling. The formulation of transitional norms is needed as a mitigating measure against the potential regulatory vacuum, while also ensuring the order of the legal system during the transition period following the Constitutional Court's ruling. This scheme is expected to maintain the consistency of the principle of simultaneity functionally, provide legal certainty for organizers, and enable synchronization of budget planning and election stages without disrupting the stability of the central and regional governments.

Keywords


Simultaneous Elections; Constitutional Court Ruling; Regulatory Chaos.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amir M, (2020) "Keserentakan Pemilu 2024 yang Paling Ideal Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia", Jurnal AL-ISHLAH, Vol. 23, No.2, DOI: https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i2.41

Asmara G,(2022) "Pemilihan Umum Serentak Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 55/PUU- XVII/2019 dan Implikasinya Terhadap Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia", Jurnal APHTN-HAN Vol.1 No.1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v1i1.13

Ashari (2016), "Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Secara Serentak", Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol.4 No.1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v4i1.275

Ard, (2025) Implikasi Putusan MK 135/PUU-XXII/2024: Momentum Baru Demokrasi Lokal Indonesia, News UAD, https://news.uad.ac.id/implikasi-putusan-mk-135-puu-xxii-2024-momentum- baru- demokrasi-lokal- indonesia/

Alif Satrio, (2025), Pemilu Serentak: bahaya Penentuan Kebijakan Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, Humas FH UI,https://law.ui.ac.id/pemilu-serentak-bahaya-penentuan-kebijakan-oleh-mahkamah- konstitusi-oleh- satrio-alif-febriyanto/

Brin, (2025), Masa Depan Politik Indonesia, Dampak Putusan MK Nomor 135 Tahun 2024, Berita BRIN, https://brin.go.id/news/123923/masa-depan-politik-indonesia-dampak-putusan-mk-nomor- 135- tahun-2024

CR 34, (2025), MPR Wanti-Wanti Dampak Pemisahan Pemilu, Hukum Online.com, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mpr-wanti-wanti-dampak-pemisahan-pemilu- lt6874b91ca9ad9/

Dwi Rahmawati, (2024), Ketua KPU Ungkap Total 181 Anggota PPK-KPPS Pemilu 2024 Meninggal Dunia, Detik.com, https://news.detik.com/pemilu/d-7260232/ketua-kpu-ungkap-total-181-anggota- ppk- kpps-pemilu-2024-meninggal-dunia

Dwi Wisnu Kurniawan, (2025) Model Pemilu Serentak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 55/PUU- XVII/2019, Tesis Unnes, https://jdih.unnes.ac.id/f/naskah-tesis-dwi-wisnu-kurniawan- 0811520058- full-compressed-1-68943312ba1e3-1?passcode=

Indekstat, (2024), Putusan MK Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024: Koreksi Sistemik Terhadap Beban Demokrasi, https://indekstat.com/putusan-mk-no-135-puu-xxii-2024-koreksi-sistemik-terhadap-beban- demokrasi-2/

KPU, (2014) Pemilu 2014, https://www.kpu.go.id/page/read/1116/pemilu-2014

Putusan Mahkamah Kosntitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013, https://share.google/7L9CJ4w7D63dIvy7Q

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 55/PUU-XVII/2019, https://share.google/AHQVzZYQDZq0GygBx

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135 PUU-XXII/2024, https://share.google/OohgN4mrCXg6dEmOg

Sania Mashabi, dkk (2020), Refleksi Pemilu 2019, sebanyak 894 petugas KPPS Meninggal Dunia, Kompas.com, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/01/22/15460191/refleksi-pemilu- 2019-sebanyak-894- petugas-kpps-meninggal-dunia

Setiawan, (2025) "Perpanjangan Masa Jabatan Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Periode 2024- 2029: Mengisi Kekosongan Jabatan di Masa Transisi Pemilu", Jurnal Hukum Berkeadaban, Vol.1 No.1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.71094/jhb.v1i1.58

Zuhad Aji, (2025). Dilema Putusan MK 135/2024, Hukum Online.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/dilema-putusan-mk-135-2024-lt6877dad13409d/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v8i1.6664

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Email: [email protected]
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License