Tinjauan Yuridis Pembuktian Elektronik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online

Zulkifli Anwar Siregar, Rafiqi Rafiqi, Nanang Tomi Sitorus

Abstract


The purpose of this writing is to be able to review and analyze electronic information evidence of criminal acts of online fraud from the perspective of criminal procedural law in Indonesia.  The method used in this writing is to use a normative juridical method approach.  The problems discussed in this paper are how electronic evidence is used to prove criminal acts of fraud through online media and how electronic evidence is used for online fraud crimes based on Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and electronic transactions, therefore the judge's task in his authority as a law enforcer is to interpret or interpret electronic evidence as an extension of documentary evidence or instructions which are valid evidence according to Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as regulated in Article 5 paragraphs (1) and (2) Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions which regulates evidence, namely electronic information, electronic documents and printouts, as valid evidence and the expansion of evidence in criminal procedural law relating to acts criminal penalties regulated in the electronic information and transactions law.  Apart from that, to assist in interpreting and interpreting electronic evidence, judges need expert testimony in the evidentiary process. So, electronic information evidence is an extension of expert testimony and guidance evidence in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, expansion of legal evidence based on criminal procedural law. Furthermore, in Article 5 paragraph (3) of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, through a negative legal proof system, that proof is not based only on legal regulations, but also on the judge's belief, so the judge also needs expert information to find out the real facts regarding electronic evidence, p. This relates to article 1 points 1 and 4 of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions.

Keywords


Electronic Information Evidence; Online Fraud Crime; Criminal Procedure Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wahid A., & Labib, M (2005), Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime), Refika Aditama, Bandung, hlm. 13.

Kholid, A. (2014), “Penafsiran Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia”, Volume VI No.11, Al.Adl, hlm. 10

Ahmad Supardi Hasibuan, 2010, Pengaruh Globalisasi Terhadap Perkembangan Hukum Pidana. Kemenag Riau,hlm. 27

Budi Suhariyanto, 2012, Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) Urgensi Pengaturan dan Celah Hukumnya, Rajawali Press, Depok, hlm. 3

Dedi Harianto, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumeren (Terhadap Periklanan yang Menyesatkan), Gahlia Indonesia, Bogor, 2010, hlm. 5.

Jazim Hamidi, 2005, Hermeneutika Hukum, cet. I, Yogyakarta, UII Press, hlm. 53-57

Lestari, S. E. (2018). Pancasila Dalam Konstruksi Sistem Hukum Nasional. Negara dan Keadilan, 7(2), hlm. 85-90

M. Yahya Harahap,2006, Pernbahasan Pennasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Perneriksaan Sidang Pengadilan Banding Kasasi dun Peninjoan Kernbali, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, hlm. 277.

M. Yahya Harahap. 2012, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Hlm 252-255. Dalam Syaiful Bahri, Beban Pembuktian Dalam Beberapa Praktik Peradilan. Gramata Publishing. Jakarta. hlm.20.

Nurlaili Isman dan Arima Koyimatun, 2014, “Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Informasi Elektronik Pada Dokumen Elektronik Serta Hasil Cetaknya Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana”, Volume 1 Nomor 2, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, hlm. 109-116

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2005, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta. Kencana Prenada Medua Group. hlm. 92

Satria Nur Fauzi, Lushiana Primasari, 2019, Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dalam Transaksi Di Situs Jual Beli Online (E-Commerce) , Jurnal UNS, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Sidharta, Data, Informasi, dan Dokumen Elektronik. Diakses dari business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/10/24/data-informasi-dan-dokumen-elektronik Pada tanggal 2 Mei 2019 pukul 20:00

Survei APJII: Penetrasi Internet di Indonesia Capai 143 Juta Jiwa. Diakses dari https://apjii.or.id/downfile/file/ BULETINAPJIIEDISI22Maret2018.pdf pada hari Kamis, 20 Oktober 2018 Pukul 12:29 WIB.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v6i2.5343

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Email: [email protected]
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License