Analysis of Article 433 of the Civil Code: Dilemma of Persons with Disabilities in Carrying Out Legal Acts

Shenti Agustini, Agustianto Agustianto, Febri Jaya

Abstract


The provisions of Article 433 of the Civil Code contain phrases that violate the rights of people with disabilities, especially for people with non-permanent mental disabilities. Through this provision, people with permanent mental disabilities are prevented from carrying out legal actions. This research aims to analyze the skills of people with disabilities in carrying out legal actions and analyze the provisions of Article 433 of the Civil Code with the Constitution. The research method used is normative juridical. In formulating the answer to the problem, a juridical basis and a theoretical basis are used. The research results show that the provisions of Article 433 have discriminated against people with non-permanent mental disabilities and it has been declared through the Constitutional Court Decision that Article 433 is conditionally unconstitutional. The challenge is that the district court as an institution that has the authority to form pardons must be truly careful and careful in making decisions/decisions on requests for pardons. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the implementation of these institutions on an ongoing basis to ensure that people with disabilities receive protection for their rights as people with disabilities.

Keywords


Persons with Disabilities; Article 433; Legal Acts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afni, N., Sukkur, F., & Tanaya, P. E. (2023). Pengaturan Mengenai Kecakapan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 12(1), 3256–3268. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2023.v12.i01.p20

Darmabrata, W. (2004). Hukum Perdata : Asas-Asas Hukum Orang dan Keluarga. Gitama Jaya.

Dewi Navisa, F. (2022). Kedudukan dan Perlindungan Hukum Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Pewarisan. Arena Hukum, 15(2).

Dinas Kesehatan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (2018). Yuk Mengenal Penyandang Disabilitas Lebih Dekat. Info Dinkes. https://dinkes.jogjaprov.go.id/berita/detail/disabilitas-ragam-jenis-yuk-mengenal-penyandang-disabilitas-lebih-dekat-bagian-1

Harahap, R. R., & Bustanuddin. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Menurut Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities (CRPD). Jurnal Inovatif, 8(1).

Khoiriah, S. (2019). Kontroversi Kecakapan Anak Dalam Hukum. Jurnal Wacana Publik, 13(1).

Kurnia Dafa, D., & Adlhyati, Z. (2023). Komparasi Pengampuan (Curatele) Antara Indonesia Dengan Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Verstek, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i4.76142

Londa, A. A., Palilingan, T. N., & Midu, S. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Hak Politik Penyandang Disabilitas Mental Dalam Pemilihan Umum di Sulawesi Utara. Lex Privatum, 12(4).

Mangunsong, F. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Lembaga Pendewasaan (Handlichting) Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Tectum, 1(2). http://kbbi.web.id/kecakapan

Marwandianto, M. (2018). Pelayanan Transportasi Publik yang Mudah Diakses oleh Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Perspektif HAM. Jurnal HAM, 9(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2018.9.175-190

Muhammad, A. (2014). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Nasution, H. A., & Marwandianto, M. (2019). Memilih dan Dipilih, Hak Politik Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Kontestasi Pemilihan Umum: Studi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal HAM, 10(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2019.10.161-178

Perhimpunan Jiwa Sehat Indonesia. (2023). Menanti Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengembalikan Kapasitas Hukum Penyandang Disabilitas Mental. https://pjs-imha.or.id/index.php/18-berita-pjs/282-pers-release-judicial-review-pasal-433-kuhperdata-menanti-mahkamah-konstitusi-mengembalikan-kapasitas-hukum-penyandang-disabilitas-mental

Rizka, R., & Fadhilah, A. (2022). One Form of Protection for Persons with Mental Disabilities: An Exploration Study of Indonesian Legislations on the Protection of Inheritance Rights of Persons with Mental Disabilities. Society, 10(1), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v10i1.411

Simanjuntak, P. N. H. (2009). Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Kencana.

Subiyanto, A. E. (2016). Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Melalui Pengaduan Konstitusional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(5).

Syafi’ie, M. (2024). Ilustrasi Praktik Diskriminasi Pengampuan Penyandang Disabilitas Mental dan Tinjauan Maslahat dalam Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 31(1), 179–198.

Vallen Noya, E., & Walakutty, A. (2022). Hukum Berparadigma Cita Hukum Indonesia Demi Tercapainya Keadilan. SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum, 2(2).

Windajani, I. I. D. (2008). Pelaksanaan Hak dan Kewajiban Perdata Orang Yang Tidak Cakap Hukum di Kabupaten Sleman. Mimbar Hukum, 20(3).

Wirya, A., & Muzaki, A. (2021). Naskah Laporan Penelitian Komparasi Sistem Dukungan Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Untuk Orang Dengan Disabilitas Psikososial. LBH Masyarakat.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v6i2.3593

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Email: [email protected]
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License