Juridical Analysis of Corruption in the State Budget (Study of District Court Decision Number 49/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2018/Pn.Jkt.Pst)

Iwan Setyawan, Katherine Katherine, Nia Susanti, Muhlizar Muhlizar

Abstract


This article aims to examine the regulation of criminal acts of corruption in the management of State funds based on Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001, analyzing the judge's considerations in District Court Decision Number 49/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst which is in line with the KUHAP and Law no. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law no. 20 of 2001, as well as evaluating the verdict given by the judge in District Court Decision Number 49/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst by Law no. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law no. 20 of 2001. The focus of the problem is the regulation of criminal acts of corruption in the State budget based on Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001, the judge's considerations in District Court Decision Number 49/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst which are in line with the KUHAP and Law no. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law no. 20 of 2001, as well as the verdict handed down by the judge in District Court Decision Number 49/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst by Law no. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law no. 20 of 2001. This research uses criminal theory and prosecution theory. Data was collected through library search techniques and analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study concluded that the Panel thought that the Defendant was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act of corruption by Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001.


Keywords


Corruption Crimes; State budget

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfada, A. (2019). The destructive effect of corruption on economic growth in Indonesia: A threshold model. Heliyon, 5(10).

Alhakim, A., & Soponyono, E. (2019). Kebijakan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 322–336.

Armen, A., Aprima, F., Marpaung, R., & Saragih, G. M. (2023). Penegak Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia (Studi Terhadap Advokat, Kepolisian, Kejaksaan Dan Hakim). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(2), 2911–2920.

Aryatmaja, I. K., Sugiartha, I. N. G., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2023). Kedudukan Keterangan Ahli Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Pengadilan Tipikor. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4(1), 14–19.

Bachtiar, B. (2019). Metode Penelitian Hukum.

Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504

Budiman, B., Thalib, H., & Ahmad, K. (2020). Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Diputus Bebas: Studi Pengadilan Negeri Makassar. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 1(1), 1–19.

Handayani, B. D., Yanto, H., Pujiati, A., Ridzuan, A. R., Keshminder, J. S., & Shaari, M. S. (2022). The implication of energy consumption, corruption, and foreign investment for sustainability of income distribution in Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(23), 15915.

Harefa, N. S. K., Manik, G. K., Marpaung, I. K. Y., & Batubara, S. A. (2020). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS): Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 73/Pid. Sus-TPK/2018/PN. Mdn. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 30–42.

Kurnia, V., Lasmadi, S., & Siregar, E. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tugas dan Kewenangan Jaksa sebagai Penyidik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(3), 1–11.

Lukito, A. S. (2016). Building anti-corruption compliance through national integrity system in Indonesia: A way to fight against corruption. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 932–947.

Mulyo, J. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Bebas dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia (Study Kasus Putusan Nomor 37/Pid. Sus-Tpk/2021/PN. Jkt Pst). Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

Nugraha, R. S. (2020). Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pdiana Korupsi Berdasarkan Pasal 2 Ayat 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Korupsi Bantuan Sosial Covid-19 Menteri Juliari Batubara). PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 6(2), 59–73.

Pelizzo, R., & Omarov, M. (2019). Ethical values and the perception of corruption. Journal of Governance, 4(1), 68–83.

Sibuea, H. P., & Saimima, I. D. S. (2021). Kedudukan Kepala Desa Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pindana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 7(2), 267–290.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan. Singkat, Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.

Unas, S. (2019). Kajian yuridis terhadap bentuk putusan hakim dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Lex Et Societatis, 7(4).

Yolanda, E., Usman, U., & Sudarti, E. (2022). Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 3(2), 125–145.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v5i2.1840

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Email: [email protected]
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License