Aspek  Hukum Lembaga Paksa Badan Terkait Penahanan terhadap Debitur Pailit

Bismar Parlindungan Siregar; Budiman Ginting; Jusmadi Sikumbang; M. Citra Ramadhan

doi:10.31289/arbiter.v1i1.111

Aspek Hukum Lembaga Paksa Badan Terkait Penahanan terhadap Debitur Pailit

Bismar Parlindungan Siregar, Budiman Ginting, Jusmadi Sikumbang, M. Citra Ramadhan

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to look at how regulations regarding forced agency (gijzeling / hostage-taking) based on Articles 209 to 224 HIR and Articles 242 to 258 R.Bg, are things that are contrary to human rights and other related regulations. Normative Juridical Approach, namely research focused on studying the application or rules or norms in positive law. There are 2 (two) data collection methods, namely the library research method and the field research method. The results and discussion through the process of developing regulations that apply to forced agency (gijzeling), at this time, this has been revived with the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2000 concerning Forced Institutions, and has been absorbed by the bankruptcy law itself. The issuance of this regulation created the birth of a situation regarding the regulation of the problem of detention of a debtor in Indonesia, which in general has been regulated in Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law, it is necessary to have restrictions such as what to implement these two regulations, so that it becomes a differentiator in its enforcement.

Keywords

Gijzeling, Forced Agency, Detention, Code of Criminal Procedure.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Disriani. (2011 ). Hukum Kepailitan,. http://disriani.multiply.com/journal .

Disriani. (2011). Hukum Kepailitan,. Indonesia.

Hadi, S. M. ( 2008). Hukum Kepailitan, Prinsip, Norma Dan Praktik Di Pengadilan, . Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Ibrahim, J. (2008). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Malang : Banyumedia publishing.

K. Wantjik Saleh. (1983). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

KUHAP, (. –U. (1981 ). Patent No. Pasal 1 angka 21. Indonesia.

Manao, H., dan Triono E., (2013), Kajian Yuridis atas Penangkapan dan Penahanan oleh Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia (Studi Kasus PutusanNomor: 15/Pra.Pid/2012/PN.Mdn dan Putusan Nomor: 01/Pid.Pra/Per/2012/PN.Stb), Mercatoria, 6 (2)

Nainggolan, P.N.H., dan Isnaini, (2012), Analisis Terhadap Penetapan No: 01/Pen.Pdt.G/ Eks/HT/2010/ PN-PMS tentang Eksekusi Barang Jaminan oleh Bank dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah, Mercatoria,

Nana P. Jehani, d. (2008). 50 Contoh Perjanjian (Kontrak). Jakarta : Forum Sahabat.

Perdata, 2. K.–U. Patent No. Pasal 1243. Indonesia.

Pidana, K. U.–U. Patent No. pasal 10. Indonesia.

Putralie, E.M., Yusrizal A.S., dan Muaz Z., (2011), Perlindungan Hukum Investor Di Pasar Modal, Mercatoria, 4 (1)

Rachmadi, U. (2004). Dimensi Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Saleh, K. W. Hukum Acara Perdata; RBG / HIR, Pasal 209 s/d 224 HIR dan Pasal 242 s/d 258 R.Bg, Ghalia Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.

Sari. D.A. & Zahara, E. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Syarat Formil dan Materil dari UU No 37 Tahun 2004 terhadap Perkara Kepailitan pada Putusan Nomor 09/Pdt.Sus-Pkpu/2015/Pn.Niaga Medan, 5 (1): 14-21.

Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Jakarta: UI press.

Subekti. (1995). Aneka Perjanjian. Bandung: P.T. Citra Aditya Bakti,.

Sukanda, D. (2010, 08 02). Kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang. Retrieved Agustus 12 , 2011, from http://dadangsukandar.wordpress.com/

Sukandar, D. (2010, 08 02). Hukum Kepailitan. Retrieved Juli 15, 2011, from http:// dadangsukandar.wordpress.com

Tirayo, A.M. & Halim, Y. (2019). Problematik Definisi Harta Pailit untuk Mencapai Kepastian Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan Kepailitan dan PKPU, Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 6 (2) 2019: 130 – 137

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v1i1.111