Disparitas Penuntutan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia

Benny Leonard Saragih, Ediwarman Ediwarman, Muaz Zul

Abstract


Difference in punishment or sentencing disparity is basically a natural thing because it can be said almost no case that is really the same. Disparity becomes a problem when the range of the sentence imposed differences between similar cases so large, giving rise to injustice and can give rise to suspicions in the community. Disparities in the Criminal (disparity of sentencing) is not the same as the application of criminal offenses against the same (same offense) or the criminal acts that are dangerous to be compared (offenses of comparable seriousness) without clear justification. Based on Law No. 16 of 2004 which replaced Law No. 5 of 1991 About the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia is an institution in the field of prosecution of the main authority of the public prosecutor act prosecution about what is meant by the prosecution as well as the reference to the provisions of Article 1 point 7 and Article 137 Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure Code (Criminal Code). Research Methods in writing this thesis carried out by the method of normative law, namely analyzing and searching for answers to the problems raised by the substantive law / legal norms contained in the rules of law, the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA), the Supreme Court Circular, and etc. Factors that cause the disparity criminal offense namely Legislation Provisions factors, internal factors and external factors.

Keywords


Disparities Punishment; Persecution; Punishment System

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chazawi, A, (2013), Kejahatan Terhadap Tubuh dan Nyawa, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Ediwarman, (2014), Proses Penegakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.

Ediwarman, (2015), Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT. Sofmedia, Medan

Effendy, M, (2005), Kejaksaan RI Posisi dan Funsinya dari Perspektif Hukum, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Harahap, M. Yahya, (2012). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Edisi Kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Jusuf, M, (2014), Hukum Kejaksaan, Laksbang Justitia, Surabaya.

Marlina, M. (2014). PUNISHMENT DALAM DUNIA PENDIDIKAN DAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN. JURNAL MERCATORIA, 7(1), 46-57. doi:https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v7i1.659

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 67).

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Ketentuan Pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157).

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 76).

Simanjuntak, M., Januari S., dan Isnaini, (2010), Peran Polri dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual dalam Rumah Tangga (Studi di Unit Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak Sat Reskrim Polresta Tebing Tinggi), Mercatoria, 3 (2)

Sudarto, (1981), Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v1i1.107

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Email: [email protected]
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License