Analisis Hukum terhadap Benda Jaminan Fidusia yang Digadaikan oleh Debitur Kepada Pihak Lain

Enni Martalena Pasaribu, Darwinsyah Minin, Marlina Marlina, M. Citra Ramadhan

Abstract


The research aims to examine the transfer of ownership rights of an object on the basis of trust provided that the object whose ownership rights are transferred remains in the possession of the owner of the object. While the fiduciary guarantee is a fiduciary guarantee institution that can be used to bind the collateral object in the form of movable and immovable objects, especially buildings that cannot be encumbered by mortgage rights. But sometimes the fiduciary collateral is not always the fiduciary giver (debtor) as is mortgaged. Based on this the authors are interested in conducting more in-depth research about collateral objects that are mortgaged by the debtor to other parties. The approach method used in this research is empirical juridical. The data obtained is guided by the empirical aspects that are used as a tool. The research results obtained that the provisions regarding fiduciary guarantees are regulated in the contractual agreement clause by the finance company (PT. SMS Finance and PT BAF Medan Branch) and if not clearly regulated then the provisions of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees apply.

Keywords


Legal Analysis, Collateral Objects, Fiduciary Collateral, Pawn

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ardo, F.K. (2019). Analisis Hukum Perkara Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Nomor 38/Pdt.G/2018/PN Pdg, Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 6 (2) 2019: 96 – 101

Bahsan, M, (2007), Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Fuady, M, (2003), Jaminan Fidusia Revisi Kedua , PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Jakarta.

Hadisoeprapto, H, (2004), Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan dan Hukum Jaminan, Liberty. Yogyakarta.

Harahap, M.Y, (1991). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Jakarta, PT. Gramedia.

http://www.artikelsiana.com/2015/01/pengertian-keadilan-macam-macam-keadilan.html diakses tanggal 31 Mei 2016

Kamelo, T, (2006), Hukum Jaminan Fidusia, Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan, Alumni, Bandung.

Nainggolan, P.N.H., dan Isnaini, (2012), Analisis Terhadap Penetapan No: 01/Pen.Pdt.G/ Eks/HT/2010/ PN-PMS tentang Eksekusi Barang Jaminan oleh Bank dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah, Mercatoria, 5 (1)

Patrik, P dan Kashadi. (2005). Hukum Jaminan Edisi Revisi dengan UUHT. Fakutas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Roestamy, M. (2009), Hukum Jaminan Fidusia , PT. Percetakan Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.

Soekanto, S, (1986), “Pengantar Penelitian Hukum” , UI Press, Jakarta.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, tentang kemafaatan hukum, hal 161. http://afnerjuwono.blogspot.co.id/2013/07/keadilan-kepastian-dan-kemanfaatan.html, diakses tanggal 31 Mei 2016

Tiong, O.H, (1985), Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Unsur-Unsur Perikatan, Cet. II, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Usman, R, (2008), Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Widjaja, G dan Ahmad Yani. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v1i1.105

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum

Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Email: [email protected]
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License