Penerapan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama (Studi Putusan Nomor : 1287/Pid.B/2018/PN.MDN)

Nanda Rafina, Ridho Mubarak, M Yusrizal Adi Saputra

Abstract


The application of the law against the perpetrators of fraud committed jointly in decision number: 1287 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN.MDN, it can be seen that fraud is a crime that often occurs in everyday life, fraud crimes can be committed. individually or collectively called deelneming. The type of research used is juridical normative and analytical descriptive research characteristics and for data collection used library research and field research. analysis of the problem is carried out by the qualitative method. Application of Law Against Fraud Crime Conducted Together in Decision Number: 1287 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN. MDN, the prosecutor charged the defendant with the first indictment contained in the indictment, namely in Article 378 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 of the Criminal Code and the judge made several considerations by making a verdict against the defendant in accordance with the demands filed by the public prosecutor. Judges' considerations in making a decision on Decision number: 1287 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN.MDN have been done as well as possible, the judge made several considerations where the judge's consideration was in accordance with the demands of the Public Prosecutor and before passing the judge's decision also took into account the burdensome circumstances and which relieves the defendant and in order to impose a sentence on this decision the judge has made prior considerations, by providing certainty and justice in making the decision it will create benefits for both the defendant and the victim.

Keywords


Application of Law, Fraud Criminal Act, Jointly.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aziz Hakim, Abdul, Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.

Hiariej Eddy as., Teori & Hukum Pembuktlan ,Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.

HR, Ridwan, Hukum Administasi Negara, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.

Kansil, C.S.T, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2002.

Kartanegara, Satochid, Hukum Pidana, Kumpulan Kuliah Bagian Dua, Jakarta: Balai lektur Mahasiswa, 1998.

Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1986.

Wiyanto, Roni, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2012.

Undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Nurhafifah Dan Rahmiati, Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terkait Hal Yang Memberatkan Dan

Meringankan Putusan, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, No. 66, Th. XVII Agustus, 2015.

Ridho Mubarak, Disparitas Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan, Jurnal

Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni tahun 2015.

Siti Novalda Rigay, Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakimdalam Penjatuhan pidana Minimum terhadap Pelaku Tindak

Pidana perdagangan Orang, Fakultas Hukum universitas Lampung, tahun 2018.

Sofyan Mdl dan Abd. Asis, Hukum Acara Pidana, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2014.

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Putusan Nomor : 1287/Pid.B/2018/PN.MDN.

Surbakti, F.M. & Zulyadi, R. (2019). Penerapan Hukum terhadap Anak sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Kekerasan. Journal of Education, Humaniora, and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 2 (1): 143-166.

Pratama, A., Zulyadi, R., & Pinem, S. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan No. 311/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn. Mdn). Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(2), 974-981. doi:https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i2.784

Azizah, H., M. Hamdan, M., Mulyadi, M., & Sunarmi, S. (2021). Analisis Pembuktian Terbalik Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan MA NO. 1454 K/PID.SUS/2011; PUTUSAN MA NO. 537 K/PID.SUS/2014; PUTUSAN MA NO. 336 K/PID.SUS/2015). Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(1), 80-87. doi:https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i1.588

Pratama, A., Zulyadi, R., & Pinem, S. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan No. 311/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn. Mdn). Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(2), 974-981. doi:https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i2.784

Manihuruk, P., Eddy, T., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Peran Perbankan Dalam Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Dilakukan Oleh Nasabah. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 3(2), 325-332. doi:https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v3i2.259

Saragih, D.H.P, Zulyadi, R, & Harahap, Dessy, A. (2019). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Menyebabkan Kematian (Studi Putusan Nomor : 45/Pid.Sus-Anak.2018/PN. Lbp). JUNCTO, 1(1) 2019: 78-88,

Lubis, M. S, Hidayani, S. & Muazzul. (2019). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Anak Berhadapan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian Menurut Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pengadilan Anak (Studi Putusan No. 67/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN.Mdn). JUNCTO, 1(1) 2019: 100-112,

Naibaho, H., Isnaini, I., & Marlina, M. (2021). Akibat Hukum Berlakunya Perma Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda Dalam KUHP. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(2), 998-1007. doi:https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i2.790

Khairul, Mahmul S., dan Marlina, (2011), Kewenangan PPATK dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Mercatoria, 4 (1): 33-42

Nasution, E. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Mercatoria, 8(2), 132-144. Doi:Https://Doi.Org/10.31289/Mercatoria.V8i2.652




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v3i2.497

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.