Penegakan Hukum Oleh Polri Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Judi Online (Studi Pada Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara)

Yundha Kurniawan; Taufik Siregar; Sri Hidayani

doi:10.31289/arbiter.v5i1.1671

Penegakan Hukum Oleh Polri Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Judi Online (Studi Pada Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara)

Yundha Kurniawan, Taufik Siregar, Sri Hidayani

Abstract

Law enforcement is carried out by law enforcers. The implementation of the law in society, apart from depending on the legal awareness of the community, is also very much determined by law enforcement officials. Law enforcement by the Indonesian National Police against perpetrators of online gambling crimes at the North Sumatra Regional Police is carried out in accordance with the provisions of Law No. 19 of 2016 on amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. Law enforcement against perpetrators of online gambling crimes in the Police. The increasing mode of online gambling crimes is not accompanied by an increase in the quality and quantity of Polri personnel. Lack of mastery of information technology by investigators in revealing perpetrators of online gambling crimes. Lack of identity of perpetrators and lack of witnesses. Lack of evidence in the filing process. Lack of cooperation between the Police and providers and the public to obtain information related to online gambling crimes. The lack of cooperation between the Police and the Public Prosecutor in the process of investigating online gambling crimes

Keywords

Law Enforcement; Crime; Online Gambling

Full Text:

PDF

References

Kadir. A. (2012), Penyalahgunaan Internet di Masyarakat Indonesia, Bandung: Armico. Supriyadi. A. (2010), Hukum Dan Etika Di DuniaMaya, Bandung: Erresco.

Kansil. C.S.T., (2012). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: PN Balai Pustaka

Yulianti. Eka, (2011), Tindak Pidana Perjudian online Dan Penegakan hukumnya di Indonesia, Jakarta: Mitra Ilmu.

Ediwarman. (2014). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi, Yogyakarta: Genta Publising.

Ediwarman. (2016). Monograf Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Panduan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi, Medan: PT. Soft Media.

Himawan. H. (2008). Seluk beluk Internet, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hadikusuma. H. (2005), Metode Pembuatan Kertas Kerja atau Skripsi Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Nuh Al-Azhar. M. (2012), Digital Forensic, Jakarta: Salemba Infotek. Satrio Wahono. (2009), Cyber Crime dan Cyber law, Jakarta: Redika Aditama.

Widiamtoro. S. (2009). Modus Kejahatan dalam Teknologi Informasi, Surabaya: Pustaka Ilmu.

Putu Trisna permana, (2016), Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online (Studi Kasus Unit Cyber Crime Ditreskrimsus Polda Bali), Program Kekhususan Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.

Muhammad Sadi. (2015). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Frans Maramis. (2016). Hukum Pidana Umum dan Tertulis Di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Santoyo. (2008). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum, Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Purwokerto, Volume 8, Nomor 3.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2017. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana.

Ediwarman. (2016). Monograf Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Panduan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi, Medan: PT. Soft Media.

Soekanto. S. (2011), Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UIP.

Arifin. S. (2012). Metode Penulisan Karya Ilmiah dan Penelitian Hukum, Medan: Area University Press.

Amar. L. (2017), Peranan Orang Tua Dalam Proses Persidangan Tindak Pidana Perjudian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak, Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.

Saherodji .(2010). Pokok-Pokok Kriminologi, Bandung :Aksara Baru halaman 35.

Raharjo. S. (2014). Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Cara Pembuktian Cyber Crime Menurut Hukum Indonesia, sebagaimana dimuat di dalam http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/cl3077/cara-pembuktian-cyber- crime-menurut-hukum-indonesia, Diakses Senin 06 September 2021 Pukul: 13.20.00 Wib.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v5i1.1671